Lewis v. Shaw

California Court of Appeal Oct 16, 1934 No. Civ. No. 1456Published

Before: Marks

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's failure to file briefs or respond to an order to show cause.

Issues

Whether an appeal should be dismissed for failure to file briefs or respond to an order to show cause.

Disposition. dismissed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Under the authority of section 1 of rule V, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, the appeal is dismissed.”

1 Cal.App.2d 436 (1934) U. F. LEWIS et al., Respondents,

CLARENCE A. SHAW et al., Defendants; HARRIETT MORROW, Appellant.

Civ. No. 1456. California Court of Appeals. Fourth Appellate District.

October 16, 1934. No appearance for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondents.

Marks, J.

[1] On May 9, 1933, Harriett Morrow appealed from an order denying her motion to dissolve an attachment. The clerk's transcript on appeal was filed here on July 1, 1933. As nothing further was filed, this court, on its own motion, on September 13, 1934, ordered [437] appellant to show cause why her appeal should not be dismissed. There has been no response to the order and no briefs filed. Under the authority of section 1 of rule V, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, the appeal is dismissed.

Barnard, P. J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

Lewis v. Shaw

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief