Harris v. Union Ice Products
Before: Shepard
SHEPARD, J.
This is an action for money damages for personal injury. Defendants had judgment in the trial court, and plaintiffs appeal. Plaintiffs also purport to appeal from the order denying their motion for a new trial. Since the order denying the motion for new trial is not appealable the attempted appeal therefrom must be and is dismissed. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 963.)
The only contention presented to this court by appellants is that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and judgment.
“ When there is substantial evidence or any inference to be drawn from the evidence to support the findings of the trial court, an appellate court will not make determinations of factual issues contrary to those made by the trier of fact. ’ ’
(Smith
v.
Bull,
50 Cal.2d 294, 306 [11] [325 P.2d 463].)
“The rule as to our province is: ‘In reviewing the evidence ... all conflicts must be resolved in favor of the respondent, and all legitimate and reasonable inferences indulged in to uphold the verdict if possible. It is an elementary . . . principle of law, that when a verdict is attacked as being unsupported, the power of .the appellate court begins and ends with a determination as to whether there is any
substantial
evidence, contradicted or uncontradieted, which will support the conclusion reached by the jury. When two or more inferences can be reasonably deduced from the facts, the reviewing court is without power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial- court. ’ ’ ’
(Estate of Bristol,
23 Cal.2d 221, 223 [2] [143 P.2d 689].)
With these oft repeated rules in mind the record before us shows the facts in this case to be that plaintiff Sherman Harris is the manager of a restaurant known as Laurye’s Steak Ranch, which is located on the south side of Highway 101, one mile west of Cathedral City, in Riverside County. Plaintiff Charles Paul Harris is the son of plaintiff Sherman Harris and his wife Arlene Harris, and at the time of the accident herein complained of was about 18 months old. The restaurant has a general parking area with marked-off spaces for customer and employee parking. Black-top pavement was installed in this parking area and on the west side
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)