Cozad v. Henry
Before: Peek
PEEK, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages resulting from an automobile accident.
On October 26, 1957, at approximately 10 p. m., plaintiff was driving north on U.S. Highway 99E. One Jones, a friend, was following at a distance of approximately 150 feet behind plaintiff’s automobile. Plaintiff and Jones were traveling in the direction of a restaurant located on the left-hand side of the highway. As the two cars approached the café, they slowed down to approximately 25 to 30 miles an hour. Approximately 100 yards before reaching the entrance to the café, plaintiff turned on the left-turn blinker light on his car, looked in his rear-view mirror, and saw no one other than Jones behind him. He noted that Jones also had his left-turn signal operating. Just before making the left-hand turn into the entrance of the café, plaintiff again looked in the rear-view mirror and saw only Jones. Plaintiff was partially across the southbound lane when his ear was struck in the left rear portion by defendant, who had driven into the southbound lane in order to pass both ears.
Defendant testified he did not observe the left-turn signals on either car; that his car was traveling at a speed of 50 to 55 miles an hour; that he did not sound his horn; that he did not see the plaintiff’s ear until he passed Jones; and that when he observed plaintiff turning left it was too late to turn in front of Jones or to slow down and return to his position behind him. The record further shows that defendant left no skid marks prior to the impact.
Jones testified that the electric signals on both ears were operating; that he observed defendant’s car in his rear-view mirror; and that when plaintiff started his turn, defendant whipped out behind him.
On appeal, defendant contends that plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law, in that he failed to comply with section 22107 of the Vehicle Code, which provides that no person shall make a left-hand turn until such turn can be
[278]
made with reasonable safety, and then only after giving an appropriate signal. The law is well established that the section in question must be given a reasonable commonsense construction. Thus, “If the situation is such that the turn may safely be made if other drivers obey the law and exercise reasonable care, the driver is entitled, after giving the proper signal, to make his left turn, and, having done so, he is not to be held to have acted in violation of the statute. ’ ’
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)