People v. Ramirez
Before: McCOMB
McCOMB, J.
There are presented for determination:
(1) A motion by the appellant denominated “Order to Furnish and Certify the Whole Record”;
[716]
(2) A motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant failed to file with the elerk within five days after giving notice of appeal and present to the trial court an application stating in general terms the grounds of the appeal and the points upon which appellant relies, and designating the portions of the phonographic reporter’s notes necessary to be transcribed to fairly present the points he desires to urge on appeal as required by section 7, rule II, Rules for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal (213 Cal. xxxix).
The record discloses that March 10, 1938, appellant gave notice of appeal from a judgment pronouncing him guilty of murder in the first degree and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. No application stating in general terms the grounds of the appeal and the points upon which appellant relies, and designating the portions of the phonographic reporter’s notes necessary to be transcribed was filed until March 16th, six days subsequent to the notice of appeal.
These are the questions presented for determination:
First: Does this court have atithority to order a reporter in the trial court to prepare a transcript of all the proceedings in said court and furnish a copy thereof to appellant and us?
Second: Does a faihore to file with the clerk and present an application to the trial court stating in general terms the grounds of the appeal and the points upon which appellant relies, and designating the portions of the phonographic reporter’s notes necessary to he transcribed on appeal within the time prescribed in section 7, rule II, supra, i. e., within five days after giving notice of appeal, deprive the appellate court of jurisdiction to hear the appeal?
The first question must be answered in the negative. There is no statutory provision vesting in this court jurisdiction to order a phonographic reporter who has reported the proceedings in a case pending before the superior court to transcribe his notes and furnish a copy either to appellant or to us. This authority is vested in the superior court. (Sec. 7, rule II,
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)