In Re Simeth

40 Cal.App.3d 982 (1974) 115 Cal. Rptr. 617 In re CHRISTINE SIMETH, a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ROSEMARIE SIMETH, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. 43815. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

July 26, 1974. [983] COUNSEL

Rosemarie Simeth, in pro. per., Gerald Blank and Gary T. Wienerman for Defendant and Appellant.

Daniel M. Luevano, Rosalyn M. Chapman, Philip L. Goar and W. Kenneth Rice as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Evelle J. Younger, Attorney General, Elizabeth Palmer, Assistant Attorney General, Edward M. Belasco, Deputy Attorney General, Joseph P. Busch, District Attorney, Henry B. Sondheim and Daniel L. Bershin, Deputy District Attorneys, as Amici Curiae.

OPINION

ROTH, P.J.

Appellant, Rosemarie Simeth, having appealed from an order after an adjudicatory disposition held in the juvenile court, finding and declaring her minor daughter a dependent child, pursuant to section 600, subdivision (a) of the Welfare and Institutions Code, now moves that counsel be appointed to represent her on appeal. The order appealed from removes the child from the mother's custody. Unless the order is modified pursuant to section 775 et seq., Welfare and Institutions Code, [984] the mother would not have custody of the child during the years of the child's minority. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 607.)