Anselmo v. Glendale Unified School District

California Court of Appeal Oct 14, 1981 No. Civ. 61858Published

Before: Roth

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court held that a minor whose parents entered the United States on tourist visas is not a resident for the purpose of public school enrollment under California law, as such visa status precludes the establishment of a domestic domicile.

Issues

Whether a minor holding a tourist visa satisfies the residency requirements for enrollment in a public school district under California Education Code section 48200.
Whether the residency requirement for public school enrollment violates equal protection rights regarding alienage or citizenship.

Disposition. Reversed and remanded

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“respondents did not meet the basic requirement of residency necessary to be satisfied in order to obtain Giorgio’s admission to the Glendale public schools.”

“Nor is that requirement subject to constitutional infirmity, either as one creating a classification based upon alienage or citizenship so as to violate equal protection rights”

[522]

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

(1) By the terms of Education Code section 48200, a pupil is eligible to enroll in a public school maintained by the governing board of a school district in which the pupil’s parent resides. The section further provides that “Residency, for the purpose of attendance in the public schools shall be determined by Section 17.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.”

The latter section, in turn, provides in pertinent part that: “Unless otherwise provided under the provisions of this code, to the extent not in conflict with federal law, the residence of a minor person shall be determined by the following rules:

“(a) The residence of the parent with whom a child maintains his or her place of abode ... determines the residence of the child.”

In the instant matter, respondent Franco Anselmo, with his wife and son Giorgio, gained admittance to the United States from Italy in July 1980 on the basis of a tourist visa issued pursuant to 8 United States Code section 1101(a)(15)(B). That statute defines the status of the holder of such a visa as “[A]n alien ... having a residence in a foreign country which he has no intention of abandoning and who is visiting the United States temporarily for business or temporarily for pleasure.”

In spite of the nonimmigrant, nonresident status thus placed upon them, respondents purchased a home in Glendale and sought to have Giorgio enrolled in public school there. The application for this purpose was denied by appellant, on the ground of nonresidency. In response to the rejection, respondents filed their complaint to compel admission and for a preliminary injunction requiring the same pending trial. That injunction was granted; this appeal followed. We reverse.

As set out above, California law specifies the residence of a minor shall be the residence of a parent with whom the minor maintains his abode. By the same token, the residence of one obtaining entry into the United States on the basis of a tourist or visitor’s visa under 8 United States Code section 1101(a)(15)(B) is restricted to one

other than

Anselmo v. Glendale Unified School District

AI Brief

ROTH, P. J.

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief