Estate of Kaminski
Before: York
YORK, P. J.
Belle Kaminski died leaving an instrument testamentary in character. After a contest initiated by appellant, who is a brother of decedent, the trial court found said instrument to be a valid holographic will, and with the exception of two names appended thereto, that “said document was entirely written, dated and signed by the hand of the testatrix herself. ’ ’ .
From the judgment admitting said document to probate as the last will and testament of said decedent, and directing that letters testamentary be issued to respondent Milton Grostein, another brother of testatrix, this appeal is prosecuted.
Said testamentary instrument reads as follows:
“Last will and testament of Belle Kaminski, Dec. 8-1937 of
[780]
Los Angeles, Cal. Age 70 yrs. old & being of sound & disposing mind and memory & not acting under menace fraud or undue influence of any person whatever, do make publish and declare this my last will & testament in the manner following, that is to say
“Patsy Gene Grostein......................$5000
“Rena Weil..........".................... 3000
“Henry Grostein.......................... 5000
“Milton Grostein.......................... 5000
“Mollie Snyder........................... 500
‘ ‘ Gregg F. Bridges......................... 1000
for pleasures he gave me while on earth.
Milton Grostein to get my share of the Grostein estate & anything else left of my bonds etc.
“My clothes etc. give away to whom you please.
“Chloroform my dog when I am gone. Rena & Milton do with everything else you think fit.
Tell no one of this will.
My diamond watch to Patsy Gene, also the bow-knot pin. My ring one stone to Rena & one to Milton.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)