Guardianship of Bynum
Before: Moore
MOORE, P. J.
Minnie McVale is the maternal grandmother of George and Angie Bynum, five and three years of
[121]
age respectively. From an order denying her petition to be appointed as their guardian she appeals on the ground that the court, below abused its discretion by such denial and in appointing a stranger to the blood of the two infants. Contestant Marcus Bynum, father of the twain, also appeals from that part of the order denying his petition for letters of guardianship. The mother of the bairns was Rosie Bynum who deceased August 27, 1944. She was survived by contestant, her two sisters, Rose Couch and Rebecca Avolos, her father, and petitioner. The latter and contestant by their respective pleadings mutually accused each other of being unfit to have the custody.
After a prolonged trial in which many witnesses testified the court found the father unfit in that he drinks excessively, becomes frequently inebriated, swears in the presence of the children, and has committed homosexual acts upon the person of little George; also that he presently resides in restricted bachelor quarters on the premises of the dairy where he is employed, the sanitary facilities of which are inadequate.
The findings as to petitioner are that on the premises on which she resides there are several houses and that the common sanitary facilities are overcrowded and inadequate; that while Angie lived with petitioner the child was ill kept, dirty, ill clothed, underfed and underweight; that when she was delivered to the guardian appointed at the trial her arm was in a cast; the bandage and cast were filthy and unsanitary and her scalp and body had scales and sores which required many days to heal; also, Rose and Rebecca, who are at times in their mother’s home, have low standards of morals, engage in conversations unfit for little children to hear and have contracted sundry purported marriages. That petitioner caused dissensions between contestant and his deceased wife likewise did not impress the court that it is for the best interests of the children to be reared by their grandmother. The court concluded that contestant is unfit to have the custody, and that while petitioner is a fit and proper person to be guardian of the children yet the conditions in which she lives render it contrary to the best interests of the minors for her to be appointed.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)