Monique C. v. Superior Court CA5
Filed 10/18/13 Monique C. v. Superior Court CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
MONIQUE C., F067708 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 516478) v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS COUNTY,
Respondent;
STANISLAUS COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY,
Real Party in Interest. JOHN K., F067777 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 516478) v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF STANISLAUS OPINION COUNTY,
Respondent;
STANISLAUS COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY,
Real Party in Interest.
THE COURT* ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ review. Ann Q. Ameral, Judge. Monique C., in pro. per., for Petitioner. John K., in pro. per., for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondent. John P. Doering, County Counsel, Maria Elena Ratliff, Deputy County Counsel, for Real Party in Interest. -ooOoo- John K. and Monique C., in propria persona, seek extraordinary writ review of the juvenile court’s orders issued at a contested six-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (e))1 terminating their reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing to implement a permanent plan of adoption as to their 10-month-old son, J.K. John and Monique contend they initiated their reunification services late but are making an effort to comply with the juvenile court’s orders. They seek an order from the juvenile court continuing their reunification services and returning J.K. to their custody. We will dismiss the petition as facially inadequate. PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL SUMMARY In January 2013, the juvenile court exercised its juvenile dependency jurisdiction over then two-month-old J.K. after sustaining allegations that John and Monique used methamphetamine, were homeless, and Monique had an untreated mental illness. J.K. was placed in foster care.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)