People v. Roberts CA4/1
Filed 3/27/26 P. v. Roberts CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, D086830
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD237246)
ERIC PATRICK ROBERTS,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Carlos O. Armour, Judge. Affirmed. Eric Patrick Roberts, in pro. per.; and Laura Arnold, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Eric Patrick Roberts appeals from an order following a bench trial recommitting him as an offender with mental health disorder (OMHD) under
Penal Code sections 2970 and 2972.1 His counsel on appeal has filed an opening brief asking this court to conduct an independent review of the record under Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) and People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436) (Wende). Roberts was given the opportunity to file a supplemental brief and then submitted a letter disclaiming his guilt on the qualifying offense and asserting he is in remission. As explained below, we conclude there is no reversible error and therefore affirm the order. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In August 2014, Roberts pled guilty to assault with intent to commit rape (§ 220, subd. (a)(1)), admitting an enhancement under section 667.5, subdivision (b). The court sentenced Roberts to a total prison term of five years. In 2016, Roberts was committed to the California Department of State Hospitals as an OMHD under section 2962. Each year since 2019, the court has ordered a one-year extension of Roberts’s civil commitment under sections 2970 and 2972. In support of the March 2025 petition, the People attached an affidavit from the medical director of a state hospital. The medical director opined that Roberts suffered from a “severe mental disorder” that was “not in remission,” that his disorder could not be kept in remission if his treatment was not continued, and that he “represent[ed] a substantial danger of physical harm to others.” This opinion was supported by an included forensic report.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)