People v. Lobsien CA3

Filed 3/27/26 P. v. Lobsien CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Tehama) ----

THE PEOPLE, C104623

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 24CR1918)

v.

JEFFERY KURTIS LOBSIEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Jeffery Kurtis Lobsien asks this court to review the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We will affirm. I. BACKGROUND Defendant texted the victim threatening messages in violation of a no contact order. In December 2024, the People charged defendant by information with criminal

1

threats (Pen. Code, § 422, subd. (a))1 and misdemeanor contact by electronic communication device with intent to annoy (§ 653m, subd. (b)). In March 2025, the trial court suspended proceedings under section 1368 after it found defendant incompetent to stand trial. Prior to being transferred to the Department of State Hospitals, defendant requested a Marsden2 hearing, which the trial court denied because the proceedings had been suspended under section 1368. In June 2025, the trial court found defendant was returned to competency and reinstated the criminal proceedings. Defendant pled guilty to criminal threats and violation of a court order. (§ 273.6.) The trial court amended the information to conform to defendant’s plea. In July 2025, the trial court ordered defendant to three years of formal probation and 180 days in county jail. The court awarded defendant 468 days of custody credits. It then asked the parties if they wanted to “waive formal reading of the remaining terms, conditions, fines, fees, et cetera?” Both parties responded, “Yes.” The minute order indicates the court adopted the probation report as if read into the record in its entirety and incorporated conditions into the sentence. The order granting probation included the following fines and fees as conditions of probation: an $80 court operations assessment (§ 1465.8, subd. (a)(1)), a $60 criminal conviction assessment (Gov. Code, § 70373), a $300 restitution fine (§ 1202.4, subd. (b)), a corresponding $300 probation revocation fine (suspended unless parole is revoked) (§ 1202.44), a $500 domestic violence fee (§ 1203.097, subd. (a)(5)(A)), and a $200 domestic violence shelter fee (§ 1203.097, subd. (a)(11)). Defendant signed the probation order indicating that he had read the order (or had it read to him), understood