Redding v. Flores CA4/2

Filed 3/20/26 Redding v. Flores CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

TARA A. REDDING,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E083593

v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVSB2300720)

DIANE FLORES, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Jeffrey Erickson,

Judge. Affirmed.

Tara A. Redding, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Mansour Law Group, John F. Mansour, and Steven G. Candelas, for Defendant

and Respondent.

I.

INTRODUCTION

Tara A. Redding, proceeding in pro. per., appeals the trial court’s order dismissing

her case. We affirm.

1

II.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Redding filed a complaint against Diane Flores alleging claims arising out of a 1 property sale. Flores filed a demurrer and a motion to strike, but Redding filed a First