People v. Hernandez CA2/3
Filed 3/12/26 P. v. Hernandez CA2/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE, B345677
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 25SFCF00096) v.
MANUEL HERNANDEZ,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael Terrell, Judge. Affirmed. Jake E. Stanton, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗
A jury found Manuel Hernandez guilty of arson of the property of another. The trial court imposed a sentence of two years in state prison. Hernandez appealed. Hernandez’s appellate counsel has asked us to conduct an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). We affirm. On January 14, 2025, when wildfires were burning in various places in Los Angeles County, George Godfrey was walking home after doing some grocery shopping. While waiting for a traffic light to turn green, he saw smoke coming from a tree in a highly populated area. As he watched, Godfrey saw fire “erupt” in the tree. He also saw a person with a stick poking the tree. The flames grew larger as Godfrey watched. Godfrey ran to his house, grabbed a fire extinguisher, and ran back across the street to try to put out the fire. As Godfrey sprayed the tree with the fire extinguisher, he heard coughing. Hernandez was standing behind the tree, holding a can of beer. Godfrey asked Hernandez if he was going to use the beer to put out the fire. Hernandez responded: “No. . . . I like the smoke. I like the way eucalyptus smells. I started a little fire right here, and it got out of control.” The center portion of the tree was charred and burnt. Godfrey called 911. When police arrived, they recorded their interaction with Hernandez with body-worn cameras. One officer read Hernandez his Miranda rights.1 When asked who started the fire, Hernandez responded that it was not his intention to burn the whole tree or the whole neighborhood. An officer said: “You shouldn’t be starting fires, period.” Hernandez responded, “I know, I understand.” When asked why he would
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)