People v. Raouf CA2/3

Filed 2/18/26 P. v. Raouf CA2/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE, B340815

Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SA089323 v.

JOSEPH RAOUF,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William L. Sadler, Judge. Dismissed. Elizabeth K. Horowitz, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗

Appellant Joseph Raouf appeals from the superior court’s order denying his request to recall his sentence and resentence him under Penal Code section 1172.1.1 Appellate counsel asks us to follow the procedures outlined in People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216.2 Because we conclude the superior court’s order is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND On June 23, 2016, a trial court found Raouf guilty of three counts of second degree robbery (§ 211; counts 1, 6, & 7), two counts of resisting an executive officer (§ 69; counts 3 & 13), one count of possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 29800, subd. (a)(1); count 5), one count of assault with a deadly weapon upon a peace officer (§ 245, subd. (c); count 10); one count of criminal threats (§ 422, subd. (a); count 11), and one misdemeanor count of battery upon a peace officer (§ 243, subd. (b); count 12). The court found allegations true for being personally armed with a firearm as to the robbery convictions in counts 1 and 7. The court found the allegation not true for being personally armed with a firearm for the robbery conviction in count 6. After hearing evidence in the sanity phase of the trial, the court concluded that Raouf was sane at the time he committed the crimes.