People v. Beckkoch CA4/3

Filed 2/4/26 P. v. Beckkoch CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G065307

v. (Super. Ct. No. 24CF0293)

MALLORY J. BECKKOCH, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Terri K. Flynn-Peister, Judge. Affirmed. Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * *

In 2024, a jury found defendant Mallory J. Beckkoch guilty of one count of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. (a); count 1),1 one count of identity theft (§ 530.5, subd. (a); count 2), and one count of theft from an elder or dependent adult (§ 368, subd. (d)(1); count 3). The court then placed defendant on probation for two years. It also stayed sentences on counts 2 and 3 pursuant to section 654 and ordered defendant to pay various fines and fees. Defendant filed a notice of appeal, and her appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), setting forth the facts of the case and requesting we review the entire record. Pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel appears to have identified one potential issue to assist in our independent review: whether the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s guilty verdicts.2 Defendant was given the opportunity to file written argument on her own behalf and has done so. The issues defendant raises are described below. We have reviewed the briefs and have examined the record in accordance with our obligations under Wende and Anders. We find no arguable issues on appeal and therefore affirm.