People v. Van CA4/2
Filed 1/20/26 P. v. Van CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E086566
v. (Super.Ct.No. FCH01225)
TOAN QUOC VAN, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Michael A. Knish,
Judge. Affirmed.
Toan Quoc Van, in pro. per.; and Charles Thomas Anderson, under appointment
by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Defendant and appellant Toan Quoc Van filed a postjudgment motion to strike his
conviction pursuant to Senate Bill No. 1393, which the court denied.
1
On appeal, counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Delgadillo
(2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo). We offered defendant the opportunity to file a
personal supplemental brief, which he has done.1 Defendant contends the court erred in
declining to strike his conviction. We affirm.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)