People v. Ubaldo CA2/5
Filed 1/16/26 P. v. Ubaldo CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
THE PEOPLE, B339056
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. PA067171-01)
SAUL UBALDO,
Defendant and Appellant.
Saul Ubaldo (defendant) purports to appeal from a postjudgment order of the trial court denying his petition for resentencing under Penal Code1 section 1172.6. Defendant’s attorney filed a brief raising no issues and asked this court to independently review the record. Defendant submitted a supplemental brief on his own behalf. Under the standard articulated in People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216, we
1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.
decline counsel’s invitation to undertake an independent review of the record. Instead, we evaluate the argument defendant raises in his letter brief. (Id. at pp. 231-232.) Finding the argument non meritorious, we affirm. PROCEDURAL HISTORY2 In July 2010, the People charged defendant with one count of attempted willful, deliberate premeditated murder (§§ 187, subd. (a), 664, subd. (a)), and one count of assault with a semiautomatic firearm (§ 245, subd. (b)). The People also alleged numerous firearm, great bodily injury, and gang enhancements. (§§ 12022.53, subds. (b)–(e)(1), 12022.5, 12022.7, 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C).) In February 2011, defendant pled no contest to attempted willful, deliberate premeditated murder. In April 2011, in accordance with the plea agreement, the trial court sentenced defendant to seven years to life, and dismissed the assault charge as well as the remaining allegations and enhancements. In April 2023, defendant, representing himself, filed a petition for resentencing under section 1172.6 and requested counsel. The trial court appointed counsel for defendant; the People conceded that defendant had made a prima facie showing; and the parties filed evidentiary hearing briefs. The evidentiary hearing was set for June 12, 2024. At the outset of the hearing, the court indicated that the People and the defendant had reached an alternative resolution of the case. The People then moved to vacate the premeditated murder sentence
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)