People v. Sanchez CA4/2

Filed 1/14/26 P. v. Sanchez CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E085216

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF1104183)

ALBERTO ROSES SANCHEZ, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Samah Shouka, Judge.

Affirmed with directions.

Richard Jay Moller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Chief Assistant Attorney

General, Arlene A. Sevidal, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Christopher P. Beesley

and Daniel Rogers, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1

Defendant and appellant Alberto Roses Sanchez appeals from the trial court’s

resentencing decision under Penal Code1 section 1172.75. Defendant’s sole claim on

appeal is that the trial court omitted updating his abstract of judgment with credit for time

served as of the date he was resentenced. The People concede the error and agree remand