People v. Willis CA1/4

Filed 1/13/26 P. v. Willis CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A171740 v. JONATHON JERMAINE WILLIS, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. 24SM009419A) Defendant and Appellant.

Jonathon Willis appeals from his conviction for attempted residential burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 664, 460 subd. (a)).1 Willis’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), summarizing the facts and procedural history and asking this court to independently review the record to identify any issues warranting review. Willis was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief, but he did not do so. We affirm but remand for the trial court to correct the abstract of judgment. I. BACKGROUND On June 20, 2024, the San Mateo County District Attorney filed a complaint charging Willis with first degree residential burglary. (§ 460, subd. (a)). The burglary was alleged to have occurred on May 24, 2024. The complaint further alleged that the burglary was committed when another

1 All undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

person, other than an accomplice, was present in the residence, thus giving notice that a conviction would constitute a violent felony conviction (§ 667.5, subd. (c)). The complaint also included two misdemeanor drug paraphernalia charges (Health & Safety Code, § 11364) and one misdemeanor count of possessing burglary tools (§ 466). These offenses were alleged to have occurred on June 3 and June 19, 2024. A preliminary hearing was held on July 5, 2024. A City of San Mateo police officer testified that on May 24, 2024, he responded to a report from S.L. who owned a home on Norfolk Street in San Mateo. She related that she was at work when she looked at her home surveillance camera and saw a car pull into the driveway. A man got out and walked around her house into the backyard. She could see the man opened the door to a “shed that was attached to the house, looked through the shed, and then walked back towards the front of the house,” looked around, and then left. The officer also spoke to S.L.’s son, J.L. J.L. resided at the location and was home throughout the time of the events captured by the surveillance camera and observed by his mother. He did not see or hear anything. The officer also testified to viewing the surveillance camera footage himself. The officer stated that it showed a white sedan pull into the driveway. A man got out and walked into the backyard. The man pulled open the door to the “shed that was attached to the house, look[ed] inside, closed the shed door, and walked around the other side of the building . . . .” The man looked at the door and windows at the front of the house and then got in the car and left. Still photographs extracted from the surveillance video showing the backyard and shed and a man looking inside the shed were received in evidence.