People v. Tittle CA2/1

Filed 12/29/25 P. v. Tittle CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE, B342654

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA126434) v.

TYRONE TITTLE,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John J. Lonergan, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. Vanessa Place, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

______________________________

In 2013, a jury found appellant Tyrone Tittle guilty of premeditated attempted murder (count 1, Pen. Code, §§ 187, 664),1 shooting at an inhabited dwelling (count 2, § 246), possession of a firearm with a prior conviction (count 4, § 22900, subd. (a)(1)), and evading an officer (count 5, Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a)). The jury found true several prior conviction allegations (§§ 667.5, subd. (b); 667, subd. (a)(1) & 1170.12) as well. Following a 2015 appeal and a successful section 1172.76 resentencing petition, the court sentenced Tittle to prison for 21 years to life, plus 9 years 4 months. On November 22, 2024, following a section 1172.75 petition, the court again resentenced Tittle, this time to 19 years to life plus 5 years 4 months.2 Tittle timely appealed. Tittle’s appointed appellate counsel filed a brief identifying no issues on appeal and requesting that we follow the procedures outlined in People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo). Under those procedures, where, as here, the appellant files a supplemental brief, we are “required to evaluate the specific arguments presented in [the appellant’s supplemental] brief.” (Id. at p. 232.) We are not required to conduct an independent review of the record to identify