People v. Jordon CA3

Filed 12/29/25 P. v. Jordon CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C102256

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 23FE015166)

v.

TYRONE A. JORDON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Tyrone A. Jordon appeals from his judgment and sentencing, in which the trial court advised that he would be subject to parole for a period not to exceed three years when released from prison. Jordon claims the trial court’s advisement should be “clarified” to reflect a period of parole supervision of two years, pursuant to Penal Code section 3000.01.1 We will affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND The details of the underlying conviction are not relevant to the disposition in this matter. We omit them accordingly.

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1

In 2024, Jordon was charged with attempted murder (§§ 187, subd. (a), 664; count one), battery with serious bodily injury (§ 243, subd. (d); count two), criminal threats (§ 422; count three), assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(4); counts four & six), and assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1); count five). The information also alleged a prior strike conviction (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12). Jordon pled no contest to count five and admitted the prior strike conviction. During the plea colloquy, the trial court advised Jordon that under the plea agreement, he would be sentenced to eight years in state prison, “[a]nd after you’re released from state prison, you’d be supervised for up to 3 years and may be required to serve an additional 6 months for any violation of that parole.” The trial court sentenced Jordon to four years in state prison, doubled to eight years for the prior strike. The trial court also advised Jordon that “at the end of your period of incarceration you will be on parole not to exceed three years. If you violate any condition of your parole, you may be revoked and returned to custody for up to one year.” The trial court then dismissed the remaining counts and allegations upon motion of the People. Jordon timely appealed and was granted a certificate of probable cause. (§ 1237.5.) DISCUSSION Jordon contends the judgment must be “clarified” to include a period of parole supervision of two years, not three. The People argue in response that the trial court did not set the parole term, but instead merely advised Jordon of a possible parole term, and therefore the judgment need not be modified. We agree that modification of the judgment is unnecessary. When the trial court imposes a determinate term under section 1170, the “court shall . . . inform the defendant that as part of the sentence after expiration of the term they