Marriage of Ghazaryan CA2/2

California Court of Appeal Dec 23, 2025 No. B338367Unpublished

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's order requiring the appellant to pay the respondent $37,581.31, finding that the appellant failed to meet her burden of proving error or providing an adequate record for review.

Issues

Whether the trial court erred in ordering the appellant to pay the respondent $37,581.31 as an equalization payment following a remand for accounting.
Whether the appellant met her burden of providing an adequate record and reasoned legal argument to support her claim of error on appeal.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Siranuysh has failed to meet her burden on appeal of proving error, therefore we affirm the trial court’s order.”

“When an appellant fails to provide an adequate record, we cannot meaningfully review the trial court’s decision.”

“Siranuysh has failed to carry her burden of showing error on appeal.”

Filed 12/23/25 Marriage of Ghazaryan CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re Marriage of SAMVEL and B338367 SIRANUYSH GHAZARYAN. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VD087018)

SIRANUYSH GHAZARYAN,

Appellant,

SAMVEL GHAZARYAN,

Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Maria Puente-Porras, Judge. Affirmed.

Siranuysh Ghazaryan, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Samvel Ghazaryan, in pro. per., for Respondent.

******

In this marital dissolution case, Siranuysh Ghazaryan1 appeals a March 20, 2024 order of the trial court directing her to pay Samvel Ghazaryan the sum of $37,581.31. Siranuysh and Samvel both appear in this appeal in propria persona. Siranuysh has failed to meet her burden on appeal of proving error, therefore we affirm the trial court’s order.

BACKGROUND The parties were before this court in connection with a previous appeal from a postjudgment order dividing the proceeds from the sale of the community home. (In re Marriage of Ghazaryan (April 18, 2023, B321151) [nonpub. opn.].) The following facts are taken from our opinion in the previous matter. Samvel and Siranuysh were married in 2008 and separated in 2015. They have two children. The trial court entered a judgment of marital dissolution on November 19, 2019 (the judgment), which incorporated the parties’ settlement agreement. According to the judgment, certain real property located on Colima Road in Whittier (the Colima property) was community property, with Samvel and Siranuysh each taking a one-half interest subject to certain conditions. The judgment entitled Samvel to the exclusive use and possession of the Colima property until its sale. On March 15, 2020, the CEO of NH Management Inc. (NH Management) executed a claim of mechanics lien against the Colima property for $35,415 plus interest for “emergency water

Marriage of Ghazaryan CA2/2

AI Brief

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

SIRANUYSH GHAZARYAN,

SAMVEL GHAZARYAN,

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

CHAVEZ, J.

LUI, P. J.

AI Brief