People v. Villegas CA1/4

Filed 12/19/25 P. v. Villegas CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A173344 v. ANTONIO SARRAZA VILLEGAS, (Napa County Super. Ct. No. 19CR001441) Defendant and Appellant.

In an earlier appeal, this court reversed defendant Antonio Sarraza Villegas’s conviction on count 1 and remanded for resentencing due to sentencing error with respect to the convictions on counts 3, 5, and 6. (People v. Villegas (December 19, 2024, A165626 [nonpub. opn] (Villegas I).)1 As defendant

In count 1, defendant was convicted of committing a lewd 1

and lascivious act on Jane Doe 1, in violation of Penal Code section 288, subdivision (a). In count 3, defendant was convicted of sexually penetrating Jane Doe 2, a minor over the age of 14, with a foreign object, in violation of Penal Code section 289, subdivision (a)(1)(C). In count 5, defendant was convicted of sexually penetrating Jane Doe 3, a minor over the age of 14, in violation of Penal Code section 289, subdivision (a)(1)(C). In count 6, defendant was convicted of forcibly orally copulating Jane Doe 3, a minor over the age of 14, in violation of former

1

raised no challenge to counts 2 and 4 in his earlier appeal, we affirmed the convictions and sentences on those counts. (Ibid. [noting that defendant challenged the conviction on count 1 and the sentences with respect to counts 3, 5, and 6; “[w]e reverse defendant’s conviction on count 1 and order that the One Strike sentences for his convictions on counts 3, 5, and 6 be reduced to 15 years to life. We otherwise affirm the judgment.”].) In this appeal from the resentencing, defendant’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) summarizing the facts and asking the court to review the record to identify any issues warranting relief. Defendant was advised of his right to file a supplemental brief and filed such a brief on September 22, 2025. After our independent review of the briefs and the record, we find no issues warranting further briefing and affirm. BACKGROUND The facts underlying defendant’s convictions are set forth in detail in Villegas I and are not relevant to our disposition, so we do not repeat them here. It is sufficient to say that all charges and special allegations in the information related to defendant’s sexual molestation of three minors, Jane Does 1, 2, and 3, from 2010 to 2019. (Villegas I, supra, A165626.) The jury convicted on all counts and found true all allegations. (Ibid.) In Villegas I, we reversed the conviction on count 1 (which related to Jane Doe 1),