People v. Redfield CA3

Filed 12/18/25 P. v. Redfield CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Nevada) ----

THE PEOPLE, C102035

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CR0001151)

v.

KENDALL REDFIELD,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Kendall Redfield filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We will modify the judgment to correctly reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement of the minimum fine amounts and direct that an amended abstract of judgment be prepared.

1

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 2022, the People charged defendant with continuous sexual abuse of a child (Pen. Code, § 288.5),1 three counts of committing a lewd or lascivious act on a child (§ 288, subd. (c)(1)), three counts of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor under 16 years of age (§ 261.5, subds. (a) & (d)), and six counts of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor (§ 261.5, subds. (a) & (c)). The People also alleged that four aggravating sentencing factors applied to defendant’s offenses. In 2024, defendant entered into a negotiated plea agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, defendant pled guilty to continuous sexual abuse of a child, three counts of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor under 16 years of age, and two counts of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor. The trial court imposed a stipulated sentence of 20 years four months in prison, comprising the upper term of 16 years for continuous sexual abuse of a child, three consecutive terms of one year for the three counts of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor under 16 years of age, and two consecutive terms of eight months for the two counts of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor. The court dismissed the remaining charges. The trial court awarded defendant credit for time served in custody. The court found defendant lacked the ability to pay fines and fees and waived the base fines, the court operations assessment, and the conviction assessment. The court then explained that it could not waive the restitution fine required by section 1202.4 for inability to pay, so it imposed the minimum fine amount of $300, but then added “on each count,” before staying the fine due to defendant’s inability to pay. The court then imposed a matching stayed parole revocation fine. The court ordered defendant not to have any contact with