People v. Rivastrinidad CA2/4
Filed 11/24/25 P. v. Rivastrinidad CA2/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
THE PEOPLE, B343701
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA512436) v.
MIGUEL ANGEL RIVASTRINIDAD,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard Kemalyan, Judge. Affirmed. Gerald J. Miller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, and Miguel Angel Rivastrinidad, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
In 2023, the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office filed the operative, second amended information charging defendant Miguel Angel Rivastrinidad (defendant) with attempted murder (Pen. Code, §§ 664/187, subd. (a)),1 and shooting from a motor vehicle (§ 26100, subd. (c)). As to the attempted murder charge, it was further alleged defendant personally inflicted great bodily injury upon the victim (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)) and personally used a firearm (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)). Prior to trial, defendant pled no contest to attempted murder and admitted to the great bodily injury and firearm enhancement allegations. On September 12, 2024, the trial court granted defendant’s request to represent himself for purposes of sentencing. On November 8, 2024, defendant filed a motion to withdraw his plea, contending it was the result of duress. He asserted his counsel “pushed” him to accept the plea deal by stating defendant would lose at trial and would get a life sentence. In addition, defendant’s counsel told defendant that after entering the plea, he would deposit money in his inmate account. The People filed an opposition, arguing that defendant provided no evidence of duress aside from his self- serving statements. On November 22, 2024, the trial court denied the motion. The court then sentenced defendant, pursuant to the plea agreement, to a total of 15 years in state prison. Defendant filed a notice of appeal and requested a certificate of probable cause. His request was denied. We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal, and counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende) and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 setting forth a statement of the case and a summary of the facts and asking us to conduct an
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)