People v. Serranosliva CA4/1

Filed 11/24/25 P. v. Serranosliva CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D084623, D084624

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. SCD300164, SCD300642) JULIO SERRANOSLIVA,

Defendant and Appellant.

CONSOLIDATED APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Dwayne K. Moring, Judge. Affirmed. Stephanie L. Gunther, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. This appeal is from judgments in two cases which have been consolidated in this appeal. In case No. SCD300642, appellant entered into a plea agreement in

which he pleaded guilty to assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code,1 § 245,

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code.

subd. (a)(l)) and admitted the on-bail enhancement. He was sentenced to a suspended five-year term subject to completing a residential treatment program. In case No. SCD300146, Appellant pleaded guilty to assault and one count of misdemeanor criminal threats Appellant failed to complete his residential treatment program. His motion to relieve counsel under People v. Marsden (1970) 2 Cal.3d 118 was denied. Appellant was sentenced to prison. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 indicating counsel has not been able to identify any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to independently review the record for error as mandated by Wende. We offered Appellant the opportunity to file his own brief on appeal, but he has not responded. Appellate counsel has provided a brief but useful summary of the facts involved in the cases which make up this judgment. We will incorporate it into this opinion for background information. STATEMENT OF FACTS Case No. SCD300164 On September 25, 2023, appellant struck the victim’s car causing the tires to deflate. The victim chased appellant, who in turn hit the victim in the head with a metal object. While being transported to the jail, appellant violently kicked the backseat of the patrol vehicle. Case No. SCD300642 On August 12, 2023, appellant approached two men and asked them if they wanted to fight. Although they both replied that they did not want to fight, appellant hit one of the men in the face. Appellant then took a