People v. Hart CA4/3
Filed 11/19/25 P. v. Hart CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, G064908
v. (Super. Ct. No. 05CF3395)
OTIS DANDRE HART, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Andre Manssourian, Judge. Affirmed. Reed Webb, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.
Otis Dandre Hart filed a petition in the superior court for recall and resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.75.1 The trial court denied Hart’s petition as he had failed to establish grounds warranting relief. Hart appealed.2 Appointed appellate counsel for Hart filed a brief pursuant to People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216. Hart was given an opportunity to file a supplemental brief but did not do so. Exercising our discretion under Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at page 232, we examined the entire record and find no reasonably arguable issue. We therefore affirm. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 2007, a jury convicted Hart of conspiracy to commit robbery, 17 counts of second degree robbery (§§ 211, 212.5, subd. (c)), one count of assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(2)), and being an active member of a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (a)). The jury also found certain enhancements to be true. On direct appeal to this court, the judgment was affirmed in part and reversed in part. (People v. Hart (Aug. 31, 2009, G039836) [nonpub. opn.].) On remand, the trial court sentenced Hart to a total term of 41 years in state prison. DISCUSSION “Prison priors are governed by section 667.5. When first enacted in 1976, this section required trial courts to impose a one-year enhancement for any nonviolent felony for which a prison sentence was imposed, unless the defendant remained free of custody for at least five years after completing
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)