In re C.Y. CA3

Filed 11/12/25 In re C.Y. CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

In re C.Y., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, C102699

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. JD20230143, JD20230168) v.

C.Y.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for minor C.Y. (minor) asks this court to conduct an independent review of the record under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to minor, we affirm the judgment. BACKGROUND In June 2023, a juvenile wardship petition was filed in Sacramento County case No. 142124 (the Sacramento County case) pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The petition alleged that minor evaded an officer and drove against traffic (Veh. Code, § 2800.4), drove recklessly while fleeing a peace officer (Veh. Code,

1

§ 2800.2, subd. (a)), unlawfully drove or took a vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a)), received a stolen vehicle (Pen. Code, § 496d, subd. (a)), and committed misdemeanor hit and run with property damage (Veh. Code, § 20002, subd. (a)). Later that month, the juvenile court determined that minor was a child as described in Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The court released him to a parent’s custody and ordered electronic monitoring. A few days later, a probation officer filed a motion to modify custody status, asserting that minor had violated the conditions of his electronic monitoring by leaving his residence without permission and cutting off his ankle bracelet. In August 2023, a juvenile wardship petition was filed in San Joaquin County case No. JJC-JV-DE-2023-0001103 (the San Joaquin County case) pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The petition alleged that minor committed assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) and misdemeanor giving false information to an officer (Pen. Code, § 148.9, subd. (a)). A second count alleging assault with a deadly weapon was later added. In September 2023, in the San Joaquin County case, minor admitted one count of assault with a deadly weapon by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4).) The juvenile court determined that minor was a child as described in Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The court subsequently transferred the case to Yolo County, where minor resided. The Yolo County Superior Court docketed the matter as case number JD20230143. Later that month, in the Sacramento County case, the juvenile court determined that minor was a child as described in Welfare and Institutions Code section 602. The court found that minor had violated a court order and that detention was necessary for the protection of minor and the protection of other persons or property. The court found that minor’s continued residence in a parent’s home was contrary to his welfare and that