People v. Young CA2/4

Filed 10/20/25 P. v. Young CA2/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE, B338309

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA018690-01) v.

SURI SANAKABIS YOUNG,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jacqueline H. Lewis, Judge. Dismissed. Lauren Noriega, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Defendant Zuri Sana Kabisa Young1 appeals from the trial court’s order declining to resentence him under Penal Code section 1172.1.2 Because the order is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In October 1993, Young was convicted by plea of four counts of attempted murder (§§ 664, 187, subd. (a)); two counts of second degree robbery (§ 211); two counts of shooting at an occupied vehicle (§ 246); evading a police officer (Veh. Code § 2800.2); exhibiting a weapon to a police officer to resist arrest (§ 417.8); possessing a firearm as a felon (§ 12021, subd. (a)); and being a convicted person with a concealed firearm in a vehicle (§ 12025, subd. (a)(1)). Young was sentenced to a total term of 16 years in state prison. In April 2024, Young filed a form request for recall of sentence and resentencing pursuant to Assembly Bill 600 and section 1172.1. The trial court issued an order stating it had reviewed and considered Young’s petition and “[n]o further action [would] be taken.” Young appealed. His appointed appellate counsel filed a brief recognizing courts of appeal have found “similar orders” nonappealable, raising no issues, and requesting we follow the procedures outlined in People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216. Young filed a supplemental brief, asserting there were “multiple violations/errors of facts and law by the lower courts bias,