People v. Amie CA2/8
Filed 10/14/25 P. v. Amie CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION EIGHT
THE PEOPLE, B338863
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA336601-01) v.
ERIN RAMON AMIE,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Charlaine F. Olmedo, Judge. Affirmed.
Robert E. Boyce, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_______________________
Pursuant to People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo), we review an order denying Erin Ramon Amie’s petition for resentencing under Penal Code1 section 1172.6. We affirm. BACKGROUND On January 31, 2011, following a jury trial waiver, the trial court found Erin Ramon Amie guilty of two counts of second degree murder. At a second hearing, the trial court found true prior strike and serious felony allegations within the meaning of the Three Strikes Law and section 667, subdivision (a)(1). The trial court sentenced Amie to an aggregate term of 100 years to life in state prison. The judgment was affirmed on appeal. (People v. Amie (Jan. 7, 2013, B230639) [nonpub. opn.].) On October 31, 2023, Amie filed a petition for resentencing pursuant to section 1172.6. The trial court appointed counsel on Amie’s behalf. On June 18, 2024, the trial court found Amie failed to make a prima facie case for relief under section 1172.6 because he was the actual killer. This appeal followed. We appointed counsel to assist Amie on appeal. On September 2, 2025, counsel filed a no issue brief pursuant to People v. Delgadillo. Counsel also stated Amie was advised he could file his own supplemental brief within 30 days. Counsel sent Amie transcripts of the record on appeal as well as a copy of the brief. On September 2, 2025, this court sent Amie notice that a brief raising no issues had been filed on his behalf. We advised him he had 30 days within which to submit a supplemental brief
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)