People v. Lollis CA4/1

Filed 10/14/25 P. v. Lollis CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE, D084891

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD304261)

WILLIAM LOLLIS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Dwayne K. Moring, Judge. Affirmed. Jill Kent, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. In 2024, William Lollis pled guilty to one count of receiving a stolen vehicle and admitted suffering a prior theft conviction. The court sentenced Lollis to a three-year term pursuant to the terms of the plea bargain, and required him to serve 18 months of the sentence in county jail, with the remaining 18 months suspended to permit him to be released under mandatory supervision.

Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 indicating counsel found no arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks us to review the record for error as Wende and Anders require. We offered Lollis the opportunity to file his own brief, but he has not done so. Based on our independent review of the record, we find no reasonably arguable appellate issues for reversal. We therefore affirm. I. Lollis was originally charged with three offenses: (1) receiving a stolen vehicle (Pen. Code, § 496d); (2) driving or taking a stolen vehicle (Veh. Code, § 10851(a)); and (3) possession of tear gas by a felon (Pen. Code, § 22810(a)). The complaint also alleged that Lollis suffered three prior felony vehicle theft convictions (§ 666.5(a)). On August 1, 2024, Lollis pled guilty to a single count of receiving a stolen vehicle and admitted suffering a single felony vehicle theft prior in exchange for a sentence of three years in local custody. As the factual basis for the plea, Lollis admitted: “[I] unlawfully possessed a motor vehicle which had been stolen with knowledge that it had been stolen; and have previously been convicted of felony vehicle theft.” At the plea hearing, the court indicated it would consider “a split of 18 months in and 18 months on mandatory supervision.” “A split sentence is a hybrid sentence in which a trial court suspends execution of a portion of the term and releases the defendant into the community under the mandatory supervision of the county probation department.” (People v. Avignone (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 1233, 1240 [cleaned up].) Defense counsel noted the court had “also indicated based on proof that [it] might consider a one-year/two- year stint,” which the court confirmed it was willing to consider. The court