In re J.A. CA6

Filed 10/9/25 In re J.A. CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

In re J.A., a Person Coming Under H053004 the Juvenile Court Law. (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. 23JV46422A)

PUBLIC REDACTED THE PEOPLE, VERSION OF OPINION

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

J.A.,

Defendant and Appellant.

J.A. appeals from a restitution order requiring her to pay $17,633 in victim restitution. Her appointed counsel on appeal has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), in which her counsel raises no issues for appeal and asks this court for an independent

 This case involves material from a sealed record. In accordance with California Rules of Court, rule 8.46(f)(1) and (f)(2), we have prepared both public (redacted) and sealed (unredacted) versions of this opinion. We hereby order the unredacted version of this opinion sealed.

review of the record. Counsel has informed J.A. of her right to file a supplemental brief, and J.A. has not done so. Finding no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable to J.A., we affirm the restitution order. I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In December 2023, the Santa Clara County District Attorney filed a juvenile wardship petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 6021 alleging that J.A. came within the juvenile court’s jurisdiction. [REDACTED]

On August 8, 2024, the juvenile court granted J.A.’s motion pursuant to section 654.2 for informal supervision.2 [REDACTED]

[REDACTED]3 Pursuant to a written,

1 All further unspecified statutory references are to the Welfare and