People v. Williams CA2/3

Filed 10/2/25 P. v. Williams CA2/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE, B337625

Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. TA131992 v.

JESSIE RAY WILLIAMS,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Laura R. Walton, Judge. Dismissed. Kree Donalyn Filer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. _________________________

Appellant Jessie Ray Williams appeals from the superior court’s order denying a petition to recall his 2014 sentence and resentence him under Penal Code section 1172.1.1 Appellate counsel asks us to follow the procedures outlined in People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216.2 Because we conclude the superior court’s order is not appealable, we dismiss the appeal. BACKGROUND On October 24, 2014, a jury convicted Williams of assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(4); count 6). The jury also found that he personally inflicted great bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)). The trial court found that Williams sustained four prior convictions which were alleged as prior serious felony convictions (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)) and prior felony convictions under the Three Strikes law (§§ 667, subds. (b)–(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)–(d)). On March 4, 2015, the trial court sentenced Williams to 31 years in state prison. On April 26, 2016, this court affirmed the conviction on direct appeal.3 On January 18, 2024, Williams filed a petition for recall and resentencing pursuant to section 1172.1. He requested that the superior court consider his medical conditions, rehabilitation efforts, completion of courses, and 10 years of incarceration