In re Jayden C. CA2/1
Filed 9/18/25 In re Jayden C. CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
In re JAYDEN C. et al., B339441
Persons Coming Under the (Los Angeles County Juvenile Court Law. Super. Ct. No. 24CCJP00792)
LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Y.R.,
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Mark A. Davis, Judge. Dismissed in part, affirmed in part.
Roni Keller, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Dawyn R. Harrison, County Counsel, Kim Nemoy, Assistant County Counsel, and Tracy Dodds, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________
Y.R. (Mother) has five children with four different fathers: Jayden C. (born 2011, whose presumed father is Jose C.); Jayleene C. (born 2013, whose presumed father is Miguel P.); Sophia P. (born 2014, whose presumed father is Christian G.); and Luna A. (born 2019) and Julian A. (born 2021), both of whose presumed father is Eduardo A. All of the fathers except Christian G. (Sophia’s presumed father) participated in the dependency proceeding at issue and were nonoffending; none are parties to this appeal. When the dependency case began, Sophia was the only of Mother’s children living with her. The other four children resided with their fathers and saw Mother infrequently. The juvenile court asserted jurisdiction over all five children based on Mother’s failure to protect Sophia from physical and sexual abuse by Jose Z., her male companion. Immediately after asserting jurisdiction, the court terminated jurisdiction over Jayden, Jayleene, Luna, and Julian by making juvenile custody orders (commonly called exit orders) that included an award of sole physical custody to those children’s respective fathers and monitored visitation for Mother. As to Sophia, the court removed her from Mother’s care and ordered monitored visitation along with Mother’s participation in services.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)