In re B.H. CA2/2

Filed 9/17/25 In re B.H. CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

In re B.H., a Person coming B335298 under the Juvenile Court Law. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. EL0419B)

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

B.H.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Christina L. Hill, Judge. Affirmed in part; reversed in part, and remanded.

Tonja R. Torres, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Susan Sullivan Pithey, Assistant Attorney General, Wyatt E. Bloomfield and Christopher G. Sanchez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

******

Defendant and appellant B.H. (defendant) appeals an order declaring defendant a ward of the court under Welfare and Institutions Code section 6021 and ordering him home on probation with terms and conditions. Defendant contends probation conditions 2 and 10 should be stricken because the juvenile court did not verbally impose these terms at the disposition hearing. Further, defendant argues the court erred in setting a maximum term of confinement because defendant was released to the custody of his parents on probation. We conclude probation condition 2 should be partially stricken. However, probation condition 10 and the maximum term of confinement should be entirely stricken. Thus, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the matter with directions.