People v. Johnson CA1/1
Filed 9/16/25 P. v. Johnson CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A172495 v. TERTRON RAVSHAUGHA (San Francisco City and County JOHNSON, Super. Ct. No. CRI-23017423) Defendant and Appellant.
Defendant Tertron Johnson pled guilty to one count of domestic violence, and the trial court suspended imposition of the sentence and placed him on probation. Several months later, the court revoked probation and sentenced Johnson to three years in prison. He appealed, and his appellate counsel asked this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende).) Johnson was informed of his right to file a supplemental brief and did not do so. We conclude that a criminal protective order entered under Penal Code section 136.2, subdivision (i), was unauthorized because it barred Johnson from contact with the victim of the incident for which his probation was revoked, not the victim of the domestic violence of which he was convicted.
Thus, we strike the protective order.1 We also order that a clerical error in the abstract of judgment be corrected. Otherwise, we conclude there are no arguable issues and affirm. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND After an October 2023 fight with his girlfriend, C.C., then 21-year-old Johnson was charged with five felony counts: domestic violence, assault with force likely to cause great bodily injury, false imprisonment, criminal threats, and assault with a firearm.2 The following January, under a plea agreement, he pled guilty to domestic violence, and the remaining charges were dismissed. On February 5, 2024, the trial court suspended imposition of the sentence and placed Johnson on formal probation for three years with various terms and conditions, including that he not possess any firearms. The court also entered a three-year protective order under section 136.2, subdivision (i), prohibiting Johnson from having contact with C.C.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)