People v. Robledo CA4/3
Filed 9/11/25 P. v. Robledo CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, G064328
v. (Super. Ct. No. FSB702311)
JOSEPH ANTHONY ROBLEDO, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, Michael A. Smith, Judge. Affirmed. Ava R. Stralla, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Respondent. * * *
Defendant Joseph Anthony Robledo appeals from an order denying his request for resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.75.1 Robledo’s appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 to inform the court that counsel had found no arguable issues and to request that we exercise our discretion to conduct an independent review of the record. Counsel also suggested one issue for our consideration. Robledo was given the opportunity to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf and was given notice pursuant to People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216, (Delgadillo) that if no supplemental brief was filed, the court might dismiss the appeal as abandoned. He did not file a supplemental brief. We nonetheless exercise our discretion to conduct an independent review of the record (Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232) and find no arguable issues on appeal. We therefore affirm. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On April 30, 2008, the District Attorney of San Bernardino County filed an information alleging that on or about June 19, 2007, Robledo committed the following: (1) Count one: Carjacking (§ 215, subd. (a)), a serious and violent felony (§§ 1192.7, subd. (c) & 667.5, subd. (c)); and (2) Count two: Evading an officer with willful disregard for safety of persons and property (Veh. Code, § 2800.2, subd. (a)), a felony. It was alleged as to count one that a principal personally used a firearm, a handgun (§ 12022.53, subds. (b) & (e)(1)) and that the offense was committed for the benefit of a gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)). It was further alleged as to both counts that Robledo had suffered three prison priors (§ 667.5, subd. (b)).
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)