People v. Schuetz CA1/5
Filed 9/9/25 P. v. Schuetz CA1/5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for pur- poses of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A172731 v. PATRICK SHANE SCHUETZ, (Mendocino County Super. Ct. No. Defendant and Appellant. 24CR06281)
Patrick Shane Schuetz appeals from a postjudgment order granting a petition to revoke his postrelease community supervision (PRCS) (Pen. Code, §§ 1203.2, subd. (b), 3455, subd. (a)).1 Schuetz’s appointed appellate counsel filed a brief raising no issues and asking us to independently review the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). We conclude that Schuetz is not entitled to Wende review. (People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216, 226-228; People v. Freeman (2021) 61 Cal.App.5th 126, 132-134.) Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
BACKGROUND
In 2021, Schuetz was convicted of second degree burglary (§§ 459, 460, subd. (b)) and sentenced to three years in prison. In 2022, Schuetz was released from prison and placed on PRCS. His supervision was scheduled to end on June 29, 2025. Among other
1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code. 1
terms and conditions, Schuetz’s PRCS required him to “not engage in conduct prohibited by law (state, federal, county or municipal)” and to report monthly (in writing) to his probation officer.
In December 2024, the Mendocino County Probation Department filed a petition to revoke Schuetz’s PRCS. The petition alleged Schuetz violated the conditions of his PRCS by, among other things, littering (Pen. Code, § 374.4, subd. (a); an infraction), using a freeway as a pedestrian (Veh. Code, § 21960, subd. (a)), committing misdemeanor trespassing (Pen. Code, § 602, subd. (t)(1)), committing misdemeanor disorderly conduct (id., § 647, subd. (e)), and by failing to provide a monthly report to his probation officer.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)