People v. Mandujano CA4/3

Filed 9/3/25 P. v. Mandujano CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G064433

v. (Super. Ct. No. 20CF2290)

ARMANDO ANTHONY OPINION MANDUJANO,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Andre Manssourian, Judge. Affirmed. Susan S. Bauguess, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * *

This is an appeal from a postjudgment order denying defendant Armando Anthony Mandujano’s petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6. 1 In April 2021, Mandujano pleaded guilty to two counts relating to an attempted murder and admitted the enhancements were true. In 2024, the court considered Mandujano’s petition for resentencing. The court denied the petition at the prima facie stage, declining to issue an order to show cause. Appointed appellate counsel filed an opening brief raising no arguable issues. (See People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216, 230.) After his counsel filed the brief requesting review pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, we issued an order granting Mandujano 30 days to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf. No supplemental brief was received. In the interests of justice, this court has reviewed the record and found no arguable issues. (See People v. Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 230 [“if the appellate court wishes, it may also exercise its discretion to conduct its own independent review of the record in the interest of justice”].) Thus, we affirm the trial court’s postjudgment order. STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Because this case arises out of a plea bargain, we do not have a detailed factual record. On August 21, 2020, the Orange County District Attorney charged Mandujano with two counts and related sentence enhancements arising out of an incident on June 23, 2020. In count one, the complaint alleged attempted murder (§§ 664/187, subd. (a)) and further alleged that Mandujano personally inflicted great bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)), and personally used a deadly weapon, a knife (§ 12022, subd.