People v. Patridge CA2/1

Filed 7/30/25 P. v. Patridge CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE, B342120

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA109099) v.

TERRANCE K. PATRIDGE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Dorothy L. Shubin, Judge. Affirmed. Edward H. Schulman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No Appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. ________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 Defendant Terrance K. Patridge appeals from an order following an evidentiary hearing denying his petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.2 His appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 identifying no issues. Patridge thereafter filed a supplemental brief asserting, in essence, that substantial evidence did not support the superior court’s factual findings in denying him resentencing. For the reasons explained below, we affirm the court’s order. On July 18, 1995, Patridge and Kevin Thomas attempted to rob off-duty Los Angeles County deputy sheriff Antranik Gevjehizian. During the robbery attempt, Thomas shot Gevjehizian, who later died from the wound. About two hours later, Patridge carjacked and robbed Eric Chong Kim. Patridge confessed his involvement in the attempted robbery and resulting murder of Gevjehizian, and his confession was consistent with information gathered from witnesses. Kim positively identified Patridge as the person that carjacked and robbed him. Patridge was charged with and convicted of Gevjehizian’s murder and the carjacking and robbery of Kim, with armed principal allegations found true as to all counts. After a direct appeal, we affirmed his conviction but remanded for the trial court to correct an error in the abstract of judgment. (People v. Patridge (Feb. 24, 1999, B117262) [nonpub. opn.].)