People v. Card CA3
Filed 7/14/25 P. v. Card CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Yolo) ----
THE PEOPLE, C101270
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. CR2023- 2626, CR2024-400) v.
JEFFREY WENDELL CARD,
Defendant and Appellant.
Appointed counsel for defendant Jeffrey Wendell Card filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts of the case and asks this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no arguable errors that would result in a disposition more favorable to Card, we will affirm the judgment. As detailed below, the trial court is directed to prepare a corrected abstract of judgment.
1
BACKGROUND1 Case No. CR2023-2626 On August 20, 2023, Card assaulted the victim with a deadly weapon, and the victim sustained great bodily injury. The victim’s cell phone was damaged. The damage exceeded $400. The complaint filed August 29, 2023, charged Card with assault with force likely to cause great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4); count 1)2 with an enhancement that Card personally inflicted great bodily injury (§ 12022.7, subd. (a)), criminal threats (§ 422; count 2), assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (a)(1); count 3), and vandalism (§ 594, subds. (a), (b)(1); count 4). The complaint further alleged, based on a 2018 burglary conviction (§ 459), that Card suffered a prior strike conviction (§ 667, subds. (c), (e)(1)) and a prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)). The complaint also alleged aggravating factors under California Rules of Court, rule 4.421 for sentencing purposes. Case No. CR2024-400 On January 30, 2024, Card fled from police in a stolen vehicle. The officers were driving marked patrol vehicles with forward-facing red lights and sirens activated during Card’s evasion. Card drove with reckless disregard for community safety and committed three or more moving violations. After fleeing the vehicle, Card was found to be in possession of a firearm. Card was prohibited from owning a firearm based on his prior felony convictions. The complaint filed February 2, 2024, charged Card with vehicle theft (Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a); count 1), evading a peace officer with reckless driving (Veh. Code,
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)