People v. Maddox CA4/2

Filed 7/10/25 P. v. Maddox CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E084715

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF1605919)

BRANDON LEE MADDOX, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Helios (Joe) Hernandez,

Judge. (Retired judge of the Riverside Super. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant

to art. VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Affirmed.

Deanna L. Lopas, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1

In this Anders/Wende1 matter, defendant and appellant Brandon Lee Maddox

appeals from his conviction under a plea agreement to six of 20 alleged felony counts

after he and an accomplice robbed a Moreno Valley medical marijuana dispensary in

2016. Defendant’s guilty plea included two counts of assault with a semiautomatic

firearm (§ 245, subd. (b)) and a count each of robbery (§ 211), dissuading a witness