Marriage of Lahijani CA4/3

Filed 6/10/25 Marriage of Lahijani CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re the Marriage of LARISSA and KAVEH LAHIJANI.

LARISSA LAHIJANI, G063982

Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 17D000491)

v. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION; NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT KAVEH LAHIJANI,

Appellant.

It is ordered that the opinion filed in this case on May 22, 2025, be modified as follows: 1. On page 3, following the subheading “POST DEFAULT JUDGMENT EVENTS,” insert a paragraph, stating: This action was filed in 2017. Our review of the record indicates that the trial court has still not entered a judgment

dissolving Larissa and Kaveh’s marriage. The only judgment in the record is the one discussed above, against Kaveh’s mother. 2. On page 3, following the new first full paragraph (ending with “Kaveh’s mother”), modify the sentence “Meanwhile, in the trial court, Kaveh and Larissa continued litigating issues,” so that the sentence instead reads as follows: After that third party dispute was resolved, Kaveh and Larissa continued litigating. 3. On page 4, in the paragraph following the subheading “APPEALABILITY,” following the citation “(Id. at p. 697.),” insert two sentences to conclude that paragraph as follows: Family law cases are atypical in often producing separate appealable judgments on the distinct issues of dissolution, support, property, and custody issues. (In re Marriage of Fink (1976) 54 Cal.App.3d 357, 366–367.) And once judgment is entered, appeals may be taken from final postjudgment orders. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a)(2).) 4. On page 4, following the newly inserted language that ends with “(Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a)(2).),” insert a new paragraph that states: Here no judgment has been entered by the trial court on any of the distinct issues present in a dissolution action. Rather, Kaveh seeks review from an order ruling on some property issues. 5. Following the newly inserted paragraph (that ends with “on some property issues”), insert the following sentence to begin the next