People v. Dawson CA3

Filed 6/4/25 P. v. Dawson CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C101297

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 10F04520)

v.

ISSAC DAWSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

In 2012, defendant Issac Dawson1 was convicted of crimes related to multiple armed robberies and attempted armed robberies. He appeals the trial court’s order denying his petition for resentencing under Penal Code2 section 1172.6. His appellate

1 Defendant’s name appears as “Isaac Dawson,” “Isaac Dabour Dawson,” “Issac Da’Bour Dawson,” and “Issac Dawson” in the record. We use defendant’s name as it appears on the order being appealed. 2 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1

counsel filed a brief raising no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 and asked that we exercise our discretion to review the record for arguable issues on appeal. This court notified defendant he had 30 days to file supplemental briefing raising any argument he wanted us to consider. Defendant filed a supplemental brief raising numerous contentions.3 Having independently reviewed defendant’s contentions in accordance with Delgadillo, we conclude none have merit. We affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND In 2011, defendant was charged with two counts of second degree robbery, two counts of assault with a firearm, two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, two counts of attempted second degree robbery, one count of unlawful possession of ammunition, and one count of misdemeanor resisting a peace officer. Various firearm enhancements were alleged as to the robbery, assault, and attempted robbery counts. A great bodily injury enhancement was also alleged as to one of the assault counts. In 2012, a jury found defendant guilty of all charges except misdemeanor resisting a peace officer, which had been dismissed. Later that year, the trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate determinate prison term of 19 years eight months, plus a consecutive indeterminate term of 50 years to life. This court affirmed the judgment on appeal. (People v. Dawson (Mar. 26, 2015, C071527) [nonpub. opn.].) In September 2023, defendant filed a resentencing petition pursuant to section 1172.6. Counsel was appointed, and the prosecution filed a brief arguing defendant was ineligible for relief because he was not convicted of murder, attempted