People v. Greenlee CA2/4

Filed 5/22/25 P. v. Greenlee CA2/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE, B337579

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA055428) v.

CHRISTOPHER ROBERT GREENLEE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Jacqueline Lewis, Judge. Affirmed. Olive Rose Meme, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Appellant Christopher Greenlee appeals from a postconviction order summarily denying his petition for resentencing pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.1.1 Appellate counsel filed a brief raising no issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo), and appellant filed a supplemental brief. We review the contentions appellant raises in his supplemental brief and affirm the order. BACKGROUND In 2002, a jury found appellant guilty of first degree burglary (§ 459), assault with a deadly weapon by means likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)), and petty theft with a prior (§ 666). The trial court also found true allegations that appellant previously suffered two prior strike convictions (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d)), two prior serious felony convictions (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)), and three prison priors (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court imposed a total sentence of 38 years to life: a third-strike term of 25 years to life for the burglary; concurrent third-strike terms of 25 years to life for the assault and petty theft, the latter of which was stayed under section 654; five years for each of the two serious felony convictions; and one year for each of the three prison priors. Two of the one-year enhancements were stricken on direct appeal. As summarized more thoroughly in the most recent appellate opinion in this matter, People v. Greenlee (Aug. 6, 2024, B316466 & B329824) [nonpub. opn.] (Greenlee), one of appellant’s prior felony convictions was later redesignated as a misdemeanor pursuant to Proposition 47, and the remaining related one-year