People v. Barber CA4/2
Filed 10/8/13 P. v. Barber CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E058267
v. (Super.Ct.No. FMB1100619)
FRANK CARL BARBER, JR., OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Rodney A. Cortez,
Judge. Affirmed.
Renee Paradis, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
A jury found defendant and appellant Frank Carl Barber, Jr., guilty of possession
of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)), and not guilty of
possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378). Defendant was
1
sentenced to supervised probation for a period of 36 months on various terms and
conditions pursuant to Penal Code section 1210.1 (Prop. 36).
Defendant appeals from the judgment. We find no error and will affirm the
judgment.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)