The People v. Castillo CA4/2
Filed 9/6/13 P. v. Castillo CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E056490
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF135543)
JESUS ALBERT CASTILLO, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Bernard Schwartz, Judge.
Affirmed as modified with directions.
Nancy L. Tetreault, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Julie L. Garland, Senior Assistant Attorney
General, and Peter Quon, Jr., and Seth M. Friedman, Deputy Attorneys General, for
Plaintiff and Respondent.
1
Defendant Jesus Albert Castillo’s original sentence required him to pay a $1,000
restitution fine (Pen. Code, § 1202.4) and a $1,000 parole revocation restitution fine (Pen.
Code, § 1202.45.)1 In a previous appeal, we modified various aspects of his conviction
and remanded for resentencing. (People v. Castillo (Sept. 27, 2011, E051070 [nonpub.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)