Carrillo v. Woodford CA4/1

Filed 8/26/13 Carrillo v. Woodford CA4/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ARACELI CARRILLO, D062480

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. EV19722)

DUSTIN M. WOODFORD,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, William C.

Gentry, Jr., Judge. Dismissed.

Dustin M. Woodford, in propria persona, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Dustin M. Woodford appeals a restraining order prohibiting him from, among

other conduct, possessing a firearm. Woodford contends the trial court abused its

discretion by not granting him an exemption from that prohibition because he needs to

carry a firearm as part of his job. He asks us to remand the matter to the trial court with

directions to modify the restraining order to grant the exemption upon a proper

evidentiary showing concerning his employment. We decline Woodford's request and

dismiss his appeal as moot.

DISCUSSION