In re Alexander E. CA4/3

Filed 7/29/13 In re Alexander E. CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re ALEXANDER E., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

THE PEOPLE, G047891 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. DL040281) v. OPINION ALEXANDER E.,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Gregory Jones, Judge. Affirmed. Cindy Brines, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * *

The juvenile court sustained allegations in a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition that defendant Alexander E. (minor) committed second degree robbery (petition 7). (Pen. Code, §§ 211, 212.5, subd. (c).) The court declared the offense to be a felony and set the maximum term of confinement at five years. Minor then waived his constitutional rights and admitted the probation violations alleged in petition 6, and the assault with a deadly weapon charge (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) alleged in petition 8. The court ordered minor continued as a ward of the court and committed him to juvenile hall for 180 days with credit for 50 days previously served. Minor timely filed a notice of appeal, and we appointed counsel to represent him. Counsel did not argue against minor, but advised the court she was unable to find an issue to argue on minor’s behalf. Minor was given 30 days to file written argument in his own behalf. That period has passed, and we have not received any communication from him. We have examined the entire record but have not found an arguable issue. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Accordingly, we affirm the judgment.