People v. Lara CA4/3
Filed 3/7/25 P. v. Lara CA4/3
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, G063655
v. (Super. Ct. No. 95NF2384)
MANUEL LARA, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
Appeal from a postjudgment order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Jonathan S. Fish, Judge. Reversed and remanded with directions. Richard L. Fitzer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Rob Bonta, Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Charles C. Ragland, Assistant Attorney General, A.
Natasha Cortina and Genevieve Herbert, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. * * * * THE COURT: Defendant Manuel Lara appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition to recall his sentence and resentence him, pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.75.1 Defendant argues he is entitled to be resentenced on his now invalid section 667.5, subdivision (b) prior prison term enhancement. The Attorney General argues defendant is not entitled to resentencing because the trial court struck the section 667.5 enhancement. We agree with defendant and reverse and remand for resentencing. PROCEDURAL HISTORY In 1998, a jury found defendant guilty of first degree burglary of an inhabited dwelling (§§ 459, 460, subd. (a); count 1) and extortion (§ 518; count 2). The jury also found true the allegation that defendant personally used a deadly or dangerous weapon (§ 12022, subd. (b)). The trial court found true the allegations that defendant had suffered a prior serious felony conviction (§ 667, subd. (a)(1)), was a recidivist having suffered two prior serious felony convictions (§§ 667, subds. (d), (e)(2), 1170.12, subds. (b), (c)(2)), and had served a prior prison term (§ 667, subd. (b)).
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)